The Wildrose Party admits its registration drive is a bust

The latest edition of the Wildrose Weekly is out. It confirms the accuracy of the prediction I made in my August 28 post, namely, that the Wildrosers have not gathered the signatures necessary to register the party:

Action breeds success

Media attention is good, says president James, but by itself is worth little. "A party has to be more than a news story, and more than a private discussion group. A party is a network of effective volunteers in which everyone helps a little. No volunteers, no party. It's as simple as that."

August has ended finding us well short of the 7,000 signatures we need to register as a party. If this is not solved now it will become a serious problem.

Without provincial registration, we can do nothing. We can't issue tax receipts or identify our candidates on the ballot.

Sounds serious, but wait:

... we ... have a new plan. Now that we know exactly how much work is involved, and the fastest way to gather signatures, we can organize it so that nobody has to give it more than a couple hours.

For this plan to succeed, however, we need you -- personally -- to commit two hours over the next three weeks. Will you? If yes, we'll explain exactly how you can help the Wildrose Party get this done.

Please tell us by email (info@wildroseparty.ca) if you think the Wildrose Party is worth two hours of your own time.

I wonder if this "new plan" will be any better than the comedy of errors the Wildrose brain trust has orchestrated to date. For those who haven't been following, I'll review some of the registration tactics that have come to light so far (after all, this stuff never gets old):

• First, the Wildrosers tried to recruit Alberta Alliance members to their cause by emailing them a donation solicitation email, and asking that they join the Wildrose Party. That plan backfired when Alliance President Randy Thorsteinson got ahold of the email and informed the AA membership that the Wildrosers had gotten their email addresses from a confidential list that had been misappropriated by one or more of the former Alliance politicos whose names appeared on the email.
• Then, on August 28, the Wildrose Party sent out an email to their own members asking them to start sneaking into apartment buildings and going door to door soliciting signatures using an aggressive, high pressure, sales script (while denying that this approach amounted to soliciting).

For the sake of the Wildrose members who answer this latest plea for help, I hope the "new plan" is more ethical and efficacious than either of these boneheaded approaches.

Just so you are aware, the last provincial party to successfully complete a registration petition was the Alberta Alliance in 2002. I understand that Randy Thorsteinson approached that task by hiring a marketing firm to go out and get the necessary signatures. He obtained over 10,000 signatures that way.

Perhaps the Wildrose Party Board should have done the same with its funds, rather than use them up putting the Executive Director and Operations Manager on the payroll.

Just a thought.

An email to the Wildrose Party

The silence has been deafening since the email scandal became public back on August 21, so I just fired off a quick note to the Wildrose Party asking for a response to Randy Thorsteinson's allegations:

The Watcher (wildrosereport@gmail.com)

Possible breach of confidentiality through usage of Alberta Alliance membership list

The Watcher (wildrosereport@gmail.com) Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:21 AM

To: The Wildrose Party of Alberta (info@wildroseparty.ca)

I am the blogger who writes The Wildrose Report. I would like to draw your attention to my August 22nd post entitled Scandal engulfs the Wildrose Party. You will note in that post that I have reproduced an email sent by Randy Thorsteinson to the membership of the Alberta Alliance on August 21, 2007. In that email, he is quoted as follows:

I have been inundated with messages from outraged members of the Alberta Alliance over an e-mail that they received from Eleanor Maroes, Marilyn Burns and Phil Gamache earlier today. I would like to state categorically that all three of them left the Alberta Alliance Party several months ago to join a rival political party. Their e-mail was unauthorized and done totally without our knowledge. In fact, they deliberately tried to hide their actions from the Alberta Alliance. Additionally, they purposefully hid their current roles on the rival political party Executive as Treasurer, Secretary and Northern Director.

I apologize that they sent you the e-mail, rest assured they did not get your e-mail address from the Alberta Alliance Party but rather from former candidates. It appears the rival party has been given your e-mail address from either Marilyn Burns or Eleanor Maroes. Each received a confidential Alliance membership list during the Alliance leadership election in 2005. Both Marilyn Burns and Eleanor Maroes were given a membership list under strict conditions of confidentiality and by divulging this list they broke their personal word to respect the confidential nature of the list. You have a right to your privacy and I am absolutely sick that these three people have betrayed that right. Unfortunately I don't know what other information they have shared with the rival party.

As you can see, there is a specific allegation from Mr. Thorsteinson that one or more members of the Wildrose Party executive has improperly breached a confidence with respect to an Alberta Alliance membership list that they obtained while members of the Alberta Alliance back in 2005.

I have yet to read any comment from the Wildrose Party on this very serious allegation. Can you please advise when, if ever, the Wildrose Party plans on issuing a response to Mr. Thorsteinson's allegations (which have been in the public domain for 5 days now).

--
Regards,

The Watcher

I will post any response that I receive.

Scandal engulfs the Wildrose Party

Well, it was bound to happen. The era of friendly public relations between the Wildrose Party and Alberta Alliance Party has come to a crashing end.

For those of you who have not heard, the membership of the Alberta Alliance recently received a recruitment and donation solicitation email from the Wildrose Party. The email was signed by three high profile defectors from the Alberta Alliance - (i) former Interim Leader Eleanor Maroes, (ii) former VP Communications Marilyn Burns, and (iii) former Edmonton Region President Phil Gamache. Here is the full text of said email (sent August 21, 2007):

We are sending you this letter to suggest you check out the website:

http://www.wildroseparty.ca/

I know you are as concerned as we are at how out of control our Conservative government is and has been for several years. As Ralph admitted – they had no plan beyond eliminating the provincial deficit and debt. It seems the Stelmach government also has no plan to manage the province’s resources, environment, infrastructure or social needs. A lack of affordable housing has created huge social problems and the government seems unable to take the necessary steps to solve the crisis.

The Wildrose Party has the backing of many previous Conservative members and donors. 200,000 Conservative members stayed home and did not vote in the last election. In the recent by-elections none of the parties gained in percentage of votes and the Alberta Alliance slipped in it’s support.

We believe the Wildrose Party is catching on with a large number of those 200,000 who stayed home in the last election. Our membership is climbing steadily and donations are sufficient for us to have hired a full time Executive Director and an Operations Manager.

Please check out our website and read our brochure (on the website). Should you decide to buy a membership and/or support us with a donation, you can do so directly from the website using your credit card.

It is obvious the Stelmach government will be vulnerable in the next election and we all need to support the party we believe most likely to challenge that government on the ground in the next election. We believe that party is the Wildrose Party of Alberta.

Eleanor Maroes
Former Interim Leader
Alberta Alliance Party

Marilyn Burns
Former candidate for Leader
Former VP Communications
Alberta Alliance Party

Phil Gamache
Former Edmonton Region President
Alberta Alliance Party

This email was quickly denounced by Alberta Alliance President Randy Thorsteinson in a second email to AAP members:

I have been inundated with messages from outraged members of the Alberta Alliance over an e-mail that they received from Eleanor Maroes, Marilyn Burns and Phil Gamache earlier today. I would like to state categorically that all three of them left the Alberta Alliance Party several months ago to join a rival political party. Their e-mail was unauthorized and done totally without our knowledge. In fact, they deliberately tried to hide their actions from the Alberta Alliance. Additionally, they purposefully hid their current roles on the rival political party Executive as Treasurer, Secretary and Northern Director.

I apologize that they sent you the e-mail, rest assured they did not get your e-mail address from the Alberta Alliance Party but rather from former candidates. It appears the rival party has been given your e-mail address from either Marilyn Burns or Eleanor Maroes. Each received a confidential Alliance membership list during the Alliance leadership election in 2005. Both Marilyn Burns and Eleanor Maroes were given a membership list under strict conditions of confidentiality and by divulging this list they broke their personal word to respect the confidential nature of the list. You have a right to your privacy and I am absolutely sick that these three people have betrayed that right. Unfortunately I don’t know what other information they have shared with the rival party.

Once again I apologize that they have given your information to a rival political party. I thought that they would honour their commitment to respect your privacy, but unfortunately they won’t.

I will do everything I can to remedy this situation.

Best Regards,

Randy Thorsteinson

I retrieved the text of these emails from the discussion forum at Project Alberta. Given that this story may develop some legs and go on for a bit, I have included all links in my public Furl bookmarks for ease of reference.

There are a few points about this developing scandal that should be mentioned:

1. I think this shows that the Wildrose registration petition is in a bit of trouble. The Wildrose Party has imposed a deadline on itself of August 30, 2007 to obtain the 6004 signatures necessary to register the party. The Wildrosers are likely finding out that there simply isn't a very large market for the sorts of strident views Albertans associate with the founding members of this party. Since few mainstream Albertans are signing up, they have little choice but to cannibalize the membership lists of the other small right wing rump parties.
2. Randy Thorsteinson indicates that both "Marilyn Burns and Eleanor Maroes were given a membership list under strict conditions of confidentiality and by divulging this list they broke their personal word to respect the confidential nature of the list." Assuming that this is correct, the sending of this email could result in professional ramifications for one or both of them. Marilyn Burns is a lawyer, and Eleanor Maroes is an accountant. As such, both are subject to a professional code of ethics. If either is found to have misused information they received in confidence, their respective professional bodies may have something to say about it. For their sake, I hope they are not involved in something this stupid. I note that the email would not appear to be digitally signed by them (their names are typed in), and may have gone out without either of them knowing it.
3. If the Wildrose Party forms a government, they will have access to all kinds of confidential information on every Albertan: health records, financial information, educational records, and so forth. The privacy of such information is protected by law, but, if the Wildrosers are willing to violate confidentiality agreements to advance themselves as a party, why would anyone expect them to show any more deference for the privacy laws designed to protect people from government snooping?
4. Randy Thorsteinson should deal with this publicly, not privately. He should make a public demand that the three signatories to the email be removed from the executive pending a full investigation. He should publicly release any confidentiality agreement that exists, and get the media asking questions about this. The public will be supportive of any effort to get answers, but, in order for them to be supportive, they have to know what is going on. I don't see anything on the Alliance website about this, nor is there anything in the media. Get it together.

I don't think we've heard the last of this. It will be interesting to see how the Wildrose Party handles this challenge. Like most political parties, they talk critically about the ethics of other parties, and about how they will be different and beyond reproach. From their website:

People are sick of politicians promising things and then not doing them.

When you live in glass houses, you shouldn't throw stones.

The Wildrose Party has some 'splaining to do, and some people to fire. It should make for fascinating viewing.